Would have flagged a late fee — held for your review
CA · not executed
Why Regent proposes this: Unit 3B, rent $2,150, 4 days late — all CA compliance checks are advisory and flagged, requiring human confirmation of locality, lease provision, grace period, and fee amount; therefore a human must review before any late fee can be assessed.
Why it needs you: Money, legal, and low-certainty actions always require human approval — this never executes on its own.
Compliance checks4
CA_locality_unverified⚑ needs reviewProperty locality not verified — only the state (CA) is known. Local ordinances (e.g. rent-controlled cities) can impose stricter late-fee caps than state law. Confirm the property's city before relying on this check.
CA_late_fee_standard⚑ needs reviewCA has NO statutory late-fee cap — a reasonableness standard applies and every fee needs human review. Cannot evaluate the advisory threshold (missing fee or rent amount). (Cal. Civ. Code § 1671(d); Orozco v. Casimiro, 121 Cal.App.4th Supp. 7 (2004); Del Monte Properties & Investments, Inc. v. Dolan (2018) — no statutory cap; reasonableness/liquidated-damages standard; explicit lease provision required)
CA_late_fee_lease_provision⚑ needs reviewCA requires an explicit late-fee provision in the lease for the fee to be enforceable. Regent cannot read the lease terms — a human must confirm the provision exists before assessing any fee. (Cal. Civ. Code § 1671(d); Orozco v. Casimiro, 121 Cal.App.4th Supp. 7 (2004); Del Monte Properties & Investments, Inc. v. Dolan (2018) — no statutory cap; reasonableness/liquidated-damages standard; explicit lease provision required)
CA_late_fee_grace_period⚑ needs reviewNo statutory grace period on file for CA; fee timing is governed by the lease. A human must confirm the lease's grace terms before assessing a fee.
This is a fictional example. See it on your real portfolio →